default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCIDReasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse 2015
- Frans H. van Eemeren:
Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse, Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation Library 27, Springer 2015, ISBN 978-3-319-20954-8
Argumentation Theory as a Discipline
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Sally Jackson, Scott Jacobs:
Argumentation. 3-25 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
The Language of Argumentation in Dutch. 27-30 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics. 31-53 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory. 55-77
The Pragma-Dialectical Research Program
- Frans H. van Eemeren:
Argumentation Studies' Five Estates. 81-109 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
The Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics. 111-125 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. 127-147 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
The Case of Pragma-Dialectics. 149-179 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussion. 181-200
The Dialectical Dimension of Pragma-Dialectics
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. 203-221 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
In Reasonableness. 223-244 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
A Procedural View of Critical Reasonableness. 245-252 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion. 253-271
The Pragmatic Dimension of Pragma-Dialectics
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Viewing the Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics. 275-296 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
The Speech Acts of Arguing and Convincing in Externalized Discussions. 297-318 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Rules for Argumentation in Dialogues. 319-329 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
For Reason's Sake: Maximal Argumentative Analysis of Discourse. 331-345
Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance. 349-379 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Strategic Maneuvering: Examining Argumentation in Context. 381-401 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Rhetoric in a Dialectical Framework: Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Manoeuvring. 403-423 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof. 425-442 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Seizing the Occasion: Parameters for Analysing Ways of Strategic Manoeuvring. 443-454 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof. 455-465
Analysis as Reconstruction
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse with the Help of Speech Act Conditions. 469-485 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Analyzing Argumentative Discourse. 487-506 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Analysis and Evaluation of Argumentative Discourse. 507-519 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation. 521-542 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Making the Best of Argumentative Discourse. 543-554
Fallacies in Argumentative Discourse
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. 557-574 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
Fallacies as Derailments of Argumentative Discourse Acceptance Based on Understanding and Critical Assessment. 575-594 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Linguistic Criteria for Judging Composition and Division Fallacies. 595-609 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
The History of the Argumentum Ad Hominem Since the Seventeenth Century. 611-629 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
How to Respond to Fallacious Moves? 631-641
Various Theoretical Issues
- Frans H. van Eemeren:
In Context Giving Contextualization Its Rightful Place in the Study of Argumentation. 645-666 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
The Role of Logic in Analyzing and Evaluating Argumentation. 667-680 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans:
Dialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves. 681-702 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Tjark Kruiger:
Identifying Argumentation Schemes. 703-712 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
From Analysis to Presentation: A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Writing Argumentative Texts. 713-729
Experimental Research Concerning Argumentation
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Bert Meuffels:
The Skill of Identifying Argumentation. 733-741 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Kees de Glopper
, Rob Grootendorst, Ron Oostdam:
Student Performance in Identifying Unexpressed Premisses and Argumentation Schemes. 743-757 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels:
The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted. 759-771 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels:
Effectiveness Through Reasonableness: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. 773-793 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels:
The Disguised abusive ad hominem Empirically Investigated: Strategic Maneuvering with Direct Personal Attacks. 795-813 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels:
The Disguised ad baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated. Strategic Maneuvering with Threats. 815-826
Case Studies
- Frans H. van Eemeren:
Democracy and Argumentation. 829-843 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
In Varietate Concordia - United in Diversity European Parliamentary Debate as an Argumentative Activity Type. 845-860 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Exploiting the Room for Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse Dealing with Audience Demand in the European Parliament. 861-874 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Flexible Facts: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of a Burden of Proof Manipulation. 875-882 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
William the Silent's Argumentative Discourse. 883-891 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
The Rhetoric of William the Silent's Apologie a Dialectical Perspective. 893-900 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Kees de Glopper, Rob Grootendorst, Ron Oostdam:
Erratum to: Student Performance in Identifying Unexpressed Premisses and Argumentation Schemes.
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2025-03-01 15:20 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
