default search action
9. ICAIL 2003 Workshop: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
- Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems, Papers from the ICAIL 2003 Workshop, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, June 28, 2003. ACM 2003
Evaluation Experiences
- Jack G. Conrad, Joanne S. Claussen:
Validation: A Critical First Step in the Evaluation of Systems for Legal Corpus Determination. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 1-9 - Stefanie Brüninghaus, Kevin D. Ashley:
Experimental Design for Evaluating an AI and Law Program. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 10-13 - Hugo de Bruin, Henry Prakken, Jörgen S. Svensson:
The use of legal knowledge-based systems in public administration: what can go wrong? Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 14-16
Design and Creation of Shared Resources
- Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
Suggestions for Standard Example Sets. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 17 - Marie-Francine Moens:
An Evaluation Forum for Legal IR System? Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 18-22
Proposals for Evaluation Methodologies
- Jean Hall, Richard Hall, John Zeleznikow:
A proposal for an evaluation repository for AI and Law systems. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 23-27 - Karl Branting:
An Agenda for Empirical Research in AI and Law. Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems 2003: 28-35
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.