"Why Turing machine equivalence is (still) important in cognitive science: ..."

Valerie Gray Hardcastle (2002)

> Home

Details and statistics

DOI: 10.1080/09528130210153523

access: closed

type: Journal Article

metadata version: 2017-05-18

- view
  - electronic edition via DOI
  - unpaywalled version
  authority control:
- export record
  dblp key:
  - journals/jetai/Hardcastle02
- ask others
- share record
  persistent URL:
  - https://dblp.org/rec/journals/jetai/Hardcastle02
Valerie Gray Hardcastle:
Why Turing machine equivalence is (still) important in cognitive science: a reply to Eliasmith. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 14(1): 9-12 (2002)

manage site settings

To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.