default search action
15. ICAIL 2015: San Diego, CA, USA
- Ted Sichelman, Katie Atkinson:
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, June 8-12, 2015. ACM 2015, ISBN 978-1-4503-3522-5
Argumentation
- Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
Factors, issues and values: revisiting reasoning with cases. 3-12
Reasoning with evidence I
- Floris Bex:
An integrated theory of causal stories and evidential arguments. 13-22
Information retrieval, natural language processing and evaluation
- Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek, Scott Sanner, Gabriela Ferraro:
A study of query reformulation for patent prior art search with partial patent applications. 23-32
Reasoning with evidence II
- Hana Chockler, Norman E. Fenton, Jeroen Keppens, David A. Lagnado:
Causal analysis for attributing responsibility in legal cases. 33-42
Reasoning with evidence I
- Rob Christiaanse, Paul Griffioen, Joris Hulstijn:
Reliability of electronic evidence: an application for model-based auditing. 43-52
Machine learning
- Michael Curtotti, Eric McCreath, Tom Bruce, Sara S. Frug, Wayne Weibel, Nicolas Ceynowa:
Machine learning for readability of legislative sentences. 53-62
Deontic logic and knowledge representation
- Guido Governatori:
Thou shalt is not you will. 63-68
Information retrieval, natural language processing and evaluation
- Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley, Ran Chen, Preethi Sureshkumar, Chen Wang, Eric Nyberg, Vern R. Walker:
Introducing LUIMA: an experiment in legal conceptual retrieval of vaccine injury decisions using a UIMA type system and tools. 69-78
Machine learning
- Erik Hemberg, Jacob B. Rosen, Geoff Warner, Sanith Wijesinghe, Una-May O'Reilly:
Tax non-compliance detection using co-evolution of tax evasion risk and audit likelihood. 79-88
Legal knowledge representation
- L. Thorne McCarty:
How to ground a language for legal discourse in a prototypical perceptual semantics. 89-98
Deontic logic and knowledge representation
- Antonino Rotolo, Guido Governatori, Giovanni Sartor:
Deontic defeasible reasoning in legal interpretation: two options for modelling interpretive arguments. 99-108
Reasoning with evidence I
- Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij:
A structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation. 109-118
E-discovery and big data
- Jyothi K. Vinjumur:
Evaluating expertise and sample bias effects for privilege classification in e-discovery. 119-127
Reasoning with evidence II
- Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij:
Constructing and understanding Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenario schemes. 128-137
Argumentation
- Bin Wei, Jinhua Huang:
Modelling dialogues in court using a gradual argumentation model: a case study. 138-147
Analysing legal texts
- Tommaso Agnoloni, Ugo Pagallo:
The case law of the Italian constitutional court, its power laws, and the web of scholarly opinions. 151-155
Argumentation
- Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
Evaluating the use of abstract dialectical frameworks to represent case law. 156-160
Deontic logic and knowledge representation
- Michal Araszkiewicz:
Incorporation of complex doctrinal theories in a model of statutory interpretation: an example of adequate causal link. 161-165
Intelligent support systems
- Michal Araszkiewicz, Agata Lopatkiewicz, Adam Zienkiewicz, Tomasz Zurek:
Representation of an actual divorce dispute in the parenting plan support system. 166-170
Machine learning
- Guido Boella, Luigi Di Caro, Michele Graziadei, Loredana Cupi, Carlo Emilio Salaroglio, Llio Humphreys, Hristo Konstantinov, Kornel Marko, Livio Robaldo, Claudio Ruffini, Kiril Ivanov Simov, Andrea Violato, Veli N. Stroetmann:
Linking legal open data: breaking the accessibility and language barrier in european legislation and case law. 171-175
E-discovery and big data
- Daniel M. Chada, Felipe A. Silva, Patrícia Borges:
Visualizing Brazilian justice: the supreme court 2.0 project. 176-180
Information retrieval, natural language processing and evaluation
- Jack G. Conrad, John Zeleznikow:
The role of evaluation in AI and law: an examination of its different forms in the AI and law journal. 181-186
Legal knowledge representation
- Mohammad Badiul Islam, Guido Governatori:
RuleOMS: a rule-based online management system. 187-191
Analysing legal texts
- Réka Markovich, Syi, Gábor Hamp:
Elliptical lists in legislative texts. 192-195
E-discovery and big data
- Alana Maurushat, Lyria Bennett Moses, David Vaile:
Using 'big' metadata for criminal intelligence: understanding limitations and appropriate safeguards. 196-200 - John O. McGinnis, Branden Stein:
Originalism, hypothesis testing and big data. 201-205
Argumentation
- Joonsuk Park, Cheryl Blake, Claire Cardie:
Toward machine-assisted participation in eRulemaking: an argumentation model of evaluability. 206-210
Machine learning
- Jaromír Savelka, Kevin D. Ashley:
Transfer of predictive models for classification of statutory texts in multi-jurisdictional settings. 216-220
Intelligent support systems
- Tom M. van Engers, Robert van Doesburg:
At your service, on the definition of services from sources of law. 221-225
Demonstration
- Jason Gabbard, Jana Z. Sukkarieh, Federico Silva:
Writing and reviewing contracts: don't you wish to save time, effort, and money? 229-230 - Anna Ronkainen:
AI analysis of trademark law: trademarknow NameCheck and NameWatch. 231-232 - Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij:
Demonstration of a structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation. 233-234
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.